{"id":3616,"date":"2024-09-07T11:18:17","date_gmt":"2024-09-07T16:18:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/?post_type=jurisprudencia&#038;p=3616"},"modified":"2024-09-15T06:48:41","modified_gmt":"2024-09-15T11:48:41","slug":"3616","status":"publish","type":"jurisprudencia","link":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/jurisprudencia\/3616\/","title":{"rendered":"EXP. N.\u00b0 04382 2023 AA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>JUDGMENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT<br>In Arequipa, the 11 days of the month of July of 2024, the Full<br>Constitutional court, composed of judges Morales Saravia<br>(president), Pacheco Zerga (vice-president), Guti\u00e9rrez Ticse, Ochoa<br>Cardich, and Hern\u00e1ndez Ch\u00e1vez, on the basis of a vote that is added,<br>pronounce this sentence. The judge Dom\u00ednguez Haro, with<br>later date, voted in favor of the judgment, on the basis of voting<br>is added. The magistrate Monteagudo Valdez issued single vote, that<br>it is also added. The judges involved digitally signed in<br>signal in accordance with the voted.<br>SUBJECT<br>Resource tort constitutional filed by mr. Arsenio I Prayed<br>Guard against the resolution dated 22 September 20231<br>issued<br>by the Second Constitutional Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice<br>Lima, which confirmed the lack of merit in the demand of cars.<br>BACKGROUND<br>Dated January 16, 20192<br>don Arsenio I Prayed Guard stands<br>amparo action against Rafael Vela Barba (fiscal upper) and gift<br>Jos\u00e9 Domingo P\u00e9rez G\u00f3mez (provincial prosecutor), with the object of<br>declare the invalidity of the Provision 1-2019-FSCEE-MP-FN, dated 7<br>January 20193<br>issued by the office of the Prosecutor Upper Coordinator<br>Special team of Prosecutors, who had rejected his request<br>exclusion of the aforesaid provincial prosecutor. Also, the amparista aims to<br>an order for the renewal of the act, fiscal and nulifiquen performances<br>of the provincial prosecutor defendant in the Folder 55-2017, related<br>the crime of obstruction of justice that is charged.<\/p>","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}}},"categorias":[29],"class_list":["post-3616","jurisprudencia","type-jurisprudencia","status-publish","hentry","categorias-tribunal-constitucional"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jurisprudencia\/3616","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jurisprudencia"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/jurisprudencia"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jurisprudencia\/3616\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3616"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"categorias","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categorias?post=3616"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}