{"id":14378,"date":"2025-06-19T11:53:21","date_gmt":"2025-06-19T16:53:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/?post_type=jurisprudencia&p=14378"},"modified":"2025-06-19T12:02:34","modified_gmt":"2025-06-19T17:02:34","slug":"apelacion-n-o-101-2024-cusco-corte-suprema-anula-sentencia-por-falta-de-motivacion-adecuada-en-caso-de-homicidio","status":"publish","type":"jurisprudencia","link":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/jurisprudencia\/apelacion-n-o-101-2024-cusco-corte-suprema-anula-sentencia-por-falta-de-motivacion-adecuada-en-caso-de-homicidio\/","title":{"rendered":"Apelaci\u00f3n N.\u00ba 101-2024 Cusco: Corte Suprema anula sentencia por falta de motivaci\u00f3n adecuada en caso de homicidio."},"content":{"rendered":"

The Sala Penal Permanente de la Corte Suprema de Justicia<\/strong> declar\u00f3 fundado el recurso de apelaci\u00f3n interpuesto por la defensa de Juan Carlos Quispe Gonzales<\/strong>, anulando la sentencia de vista emitida por la Segunda Sala Penal de Apelaciones de la Corte Superior de Cusco, que lo hab\u00eda condenado por el delito de murder<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\ud83d\udccc \u00bfQu\u00e9 ocurri\u00f3?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Inicialmente, el acusado fue absuelto en primera instancia<\/strong> por insuficiencia probatoria. Sin embargo, la Sala de Apelaciones revoc\u00f3 esa decisi\u00f3n y lo conden\u00f3 a 11 a\u00f1os de prisi\u00f3n<\/strong>, bas\u00e1ndose en una declaraci\u00f3n testifical y documentos cuya autenticidad fue cuestionada.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La defensa apel\u00f3 ante la Corte Suprema alegando vulneraci\u00f3n del debido proceso<\/strong>, falta de motivaci\u00f3n<\/strong> and limitaciones al derecho a probar<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2696\ufe0f \u00bfQu\u00e9 dijo la Corte Suprema?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

El m\u00e1ximo tribunal anul\u00f3 la sentencia condenatoria<\/strong> por incurrir en nulidad absoluta<\/strong>, conforme al art\u00edculo 150 inciso d) del C\u00f3digo Procesal Penal, debido a:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  • Falta de motivaci\u00f3n adecuada<\/strong> en la valoraci\u00f3n probatoria.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Ausencia de an\u00e1lisis l\u00f3gico-jur\u00eddico de la prueba indiciaria.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Vulneraci\u00f3n del derecho a la defensa y a la prueba.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Infracci\u00f3n del art\u00edculo 139.5 de la Constituci\u00f3n<\/strong>, que exige una motivaci\u00f3n escrita de las resoluciones judiciales.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
      \n
    • <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

      \ud83d\udcda Fundamento jur\u00eddico destacado:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
      \n

      \u201cEl derecho a la debida motivaci\u00f3n de las resoluciones judiciales implica que los jueces expresen razones claras, objetivas y fundadas en hechos probados y normas aplicables, permitiendo as\u00ed el control de legalidad y el ejercicio efectivo del derecho de defensa.\u201d
      (Corte Suprema, Apelaci\u00f3n N.\u00ba 101-2024\/Cusco – fundamento jur\u00eddico tercero)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

      \ud83d\udcdd \u00bfQu\u00e9 se orden\u00f3?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      Se dispuso la realizaci\u00f3n de una nueva audiencia de apelaci\u00f3n ante un Colegiado Superior distinto<\/strong>, garantizando una valoraci\u00f3n probatoria adecuada y el respeto al debido proceso.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [JURISPRUDENCE...]<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}}},"categorias":[],"class_list":["post-14378","jurisprudencia","type-jurisprudencia","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jurisprudencia\/14378","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jurisprudencia"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/jurisprudencia"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jurisprudencia\/14378\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14378"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"categorias","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esford.pe\/ing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categorias?post=14378"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}